Saturday, July 21, 2007

Bush was against a pay raise for the troops before he was for it

Bush Threatened To Veto Same Military Pay Raise That He Now Uses To Attack Anti-War Critics

In his Rose Garden address this morning, President Bush criticized the decision by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to pull the Defense Authorization bill from consideration, saying the move would deny a pay raise to soldiers serving in Iraq. “Congress has failed to act on” a bill that would “provide funds to upgrade our equipment, for our troops in Iraq and provides a pay raise for our military,” said Bush.

“Even members of Congress who no longer support our effort in Iraq should at least be able to provide an increase in pay for our troops fighting there,”

here's the link

BUT - and this is from the Army Times dated MAY:

White House: 3.5 percent pay hike unnecessary
By Rick Maze - Staff writerPosted : Wednesday May 16, 2007 17:34:13 EDT

Troops don’t need bigger pay raises, White House budget officials said Wednesday in a statement of administration policy laying out objections to the House version of the 2008 defense authorization bill.
The Bush administration had asked for a 3 percent military raise for Jan. 1, 2008, enough to match last year’s average pay increase in the private sector. The House Armed Services Committee recommends a 3.5 percent pay increase for 2008, and increases in 2009 through 2012 that also are 0.5 percentage point greater than private-sector pay raises.
The slightly bigger military raises are intended to reduce the gap between military and civilian pay that stands at about 3.9 percent today. Under the bill, HR 1585, the pay gap would be reduced to 1.4 percent after the Jan. 1, 2012, pay increase.

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/05/military_payhike_whitehouse_070516/

2 comments:

Gonzo said...

Let's be clear: He wasn't against a pay raise, he was .5% off of what was discussed, 3.5 versus 3.

But I do think the .5% over until 2012 is the better plan, frankly.

SeattleSusieQ said...

You missed the point - he was calling Dems anti-troops when he was prepared to veto a bill on the basis of that .5%