Ken Himmler?
I hadn't heard Olbermann's comparison of the appearance of Ken Starr to Heinrich Himmler before, so I went and looked it up.
You know, that's actually not that far off....
...all horses and riders welcome here
I hadn't heard Olbermann's comparison of the appearance of Ken Starr to Heinrich Himmler before, so I went and looked it up.
You know, that's actually not that far off....
Posted by Garrett at 9:23 PM
Labels: Posted by: Garrett
8 comments:
That's in very poor taste, Garrett, and I am requesting you remove it.
I vote to leave it. What's the problem, Gonz? It's just a physical likeness comparison.
It's not in poor taste. You said Keith compared Starr's appearance to Himmler's appearance, and implied that was a bad thing. I just posted pictures of each, so that people could evaluate the comparison for themselves.
While I might not have noticed the similarity myself, I can certainly see why Olbermann spotted it.
It's in very poor taste. There are millions of Jews who don't want to see a picture of Himmler greet them on a website.
Opine all you want on the physical similarity between the two but leave the pictures out.
OH please. I'm Jewish and this simple little photo comparison doesn't bother me. And I bet it wouldn't bother Randy, either.
Without the pictures, opining on the similarity is pointless. They are neutral: they stay.
Well, then, why were so many upset at the nappy-headed hos reference from Imus?
And the two don't even look that much alike. Himmler had no chin.
"OH please. I'm Jewish..."
*ROFL* Nicely done, Susie. :-)
Post a Comment